A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2014, the Defendant was working as an employee of the Indiana Company, “C” in the Republic of Turkey, and became aware of the victim D and E at work, and around February 2015, the said C Company made a company by discussing with the victims of the insolvency, and decided to continue the management of the company by succession to the human body work during which the company had been doing so. In Korea, the Defendant decided to make a business preparation, including the raising of funds.

On March 6, 2015, the Defendant issued a false statement to the victims that the victims received wages from C Company C’s staff member accommodation in the Asian Republic of Korea, and, on the other hand, issued a false statement to the victims that “If the victims received wages from C Company C, the victims would have been given a preference to the Defendant, who is an employee of G, who is a staff member of G, who is the age in the Republic of Korea, and we would again receive the said money if you would return to G, who is an employee of G, who is an employee of G, and you would like to find the money again to the age in the Republic of Korea.”

However, even if the victims receive money from the victims, they thought to be used as entertainment expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to conduct business with the victims using the funds for business preparation.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victims, received 9,500 US dollars (Korean KRW 10,500,000) from the victims E for business preparation, respectively, and 7,000 US dollars (Korean KRW 7,700,000) from the victims E for business preparation.

The defendant, including this, received a total of KRW 41.2 million from the victims on seven occasions, such as the list of crimes in attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Complaint;

1. Copy of bankbooks and details of financial transactions;

1. Application of immigration Acts and subordinate statutes for each individual;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant received the reasons for sentencing from the victims.