A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 6. 28. 21:50경 제주시 B에 있는 ‘C’ 마사지숍에서 술에 취해 소란을 피우다 신고를 받고 출동한 제주서부경찰서 D지구대 소속 순경 E으로부터 음주소란으로 통고처분을 받게 되자 화가 나, 위 마사지숍 앞길에 정차하고 있던 순찰차의 안테나를 붙잡고 순찰차를 진행하지 못하게 방해하고, 출동 경찰관들에게 “개새끼야, 2:1로 붙어 볼래, 왜 나를 딱지 떼느냐, 씨발”이라고 욕설을 하다가 이를 제지하기 위해 순찰차에서 내린 위 E의 손 부위를 발로 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the crime prevention and suppression of the above E, wearing police uniforms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared by E;

1. Application of penalty notification statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the statement of reasons for sentencing, shall be considered) shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the following circumstances:

The favorable circumstances: The facts of the crime are recognized and reflected in all the facts of the crime, and the circumstances that there are no criminal records at a disadvantage of the same kind: the crime committed by disregarding public authority is not good in light of the method and degree of the crime: It is decided as per Disposition on the grounds of the motive and circumstance of the crime, circumstances after the crime, the defendant'