A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 15, 201, the Defendant: (a) signed a mutual infinite coffee shop in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul; (b) and (c) obtained the victim C’s prior priority payment in a manner that does not pay the time limit money; (c) obtained the victim’s subscription to D and received the time limit money; and (d) paid the victim the victim “infinite the time limit money by riding the time limit money.”

In order to join the Saemaeul community, the member of the community has participated in the foregoing community by stating that he/she will faithfully pay the paid-in money on the face of the week.

However, the obligation borrowed from the lending company at the time was about KRW 20,000,000, and the time when the time when the obligation was extended to the lending company, and the time limit was extended.

There was no intention or ability to continue to pay the paid amount.

On February 15, 201, the Defendant received cash amount of KRW 20 million from the injured party as the time limit money No. 2,000,000, and KRW 20,000,000 from the E bank account designated by the Defendant on October 18, 201, respectively, under the name of the time limit money No. 10,000.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and defrauds 40 million won in total.

2. On April 15, 201, in collusion with the Defendant and the Defendant’s son F, at the 12th floor coffee shop of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G G building: (a) had F take a priority in having the Victim C paid the time limit money; and (b) thereafter, the Defendant himself would be entitled to pay the time limit money on behalf of F; and (c) in fact, the Defendant would be willing to acquire the time limit money in a manner that does not pay the time limit money; and (d) had F take action such as “F shall faithfully pay the time limit money,” thereby having the Defendant participate in F as the members of the said fraternity.

However, at the time, F did not have the intention or ability to pay the payment by using the repayment of the loan even if the credit is provided, and the Defendant did not have the intention or ability to continue to pay the payment on behalf of F when the obligation borrowed from the lending company reaches about KRW 20 million.

The defendant belongs to this.