A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

On June 3, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Seoul Central District Court. On February 4, 2016, the same court decided to commence a retrial, and on April 1, 2016, the court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny in the same court on April 1, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in the third prison of the Ganbukbukbuk District Court on July 26, 2016.

Criminal facts

On June 2017, the Defendant, while entering the D companies in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and C, immediately closed its business and ceased to have certain income, requires considerable amount of money due to dental treatment expenses, etc., and listened to the speech that there is an investment source in which only investments can be made by means of false names (E), and purchased the vehicle by temporarily increasing the credit card limit in collusion with the above person in a name-known name, and decided to make the vehicle a 'credit card tin' by means of selling the vehicle.

On June 21, 2017, the Defendant conspired with the above person in the name of the victim in collusion with the above person in the name of the victim, and the person in the name of the victim in collusion with the above person in the name of the victim in the name of the victim, sent the call center of the victim FF corporation to the call number verification method of the victim as he was the defendant, and then issued a copy of a certificate of employment, a copy of a sales contract, etc. to the effect that "The card limit is insufficient to purchase the benz, and the temporary limit is increased by KRW 30 million to G employees of the victim company for the purpose of purchasing the benz.

However, the defendant purchased a vehicle by increasing the limit of use of a credit card at the time, and sold and commercialized the vehicle immediately, and the defendant used the vehicle in the scheduled condition of closure.