1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) A:

(a) Attached drawings among the real estate listed in paragraph 5 of the attached list;

The main lawsuit and counterclaim are also finite.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From August 15, 2005, Plaintiff A leased each real estate listed in [Attachment List 1 and 2 (hereinafter “instant restaurant”) to Defendant F from around 15, 2005 to KRW 5 million, monthly rent of KRW 400,000. From around that time, Defendant F commenced the restaurant business in this case with “H” as its trade name, and Plaintiff A and Defendant F increased the rent to KRW 770,00 (including value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) on September 19, 207.

B. From around that time, Defendant F began to use the real estate listed in paragraph (3) of the attached list (hereinafter “the instant river site”) for the business of the instant restaurant with the Plaintiff’s consent. From April 207, Defendant F began to use the real estate listed in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the attached list (hereinafter “the instant parking lot”) for the purpose of the parking lot for the business of the instant restaurant. Defendant F, with the Plaintiff’s consent, was to install without compensation the attached list Nos. 47, 55, 54, 53, and 47, with the Defendant F indicated in the attached list Nos. 47, 56, 58, 57, and 56 in sequence, with the Plaintiff’s order indicated in the attached list Nos. 67, 67, 67, 6666, 67, 67, 67, 67, 67, 67, 67, 667, 667, 667, 667, 62, 67, 67, 4, 67, 67.

C. On September 2010, Plaintiff A had the instant restaurant registered with Defendant F around September 201.