logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.07.17 2013고정975
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a taxi for business use belonging to B CK5.

On October 27, 2012, the Defendant driven the above taxi on October 17, 2012, and proceeded at a speed of about 40km (the Defendant’s statement) per hour, depending on the two-lanes in the direction from the 'brogic distance' to the 'unit of unification'. The Defendant driven the above taxi at a speed of about 40km (hereinafter the Defendant’s statement) in the direction of ‘erogic Park-nam Park' located in Eunpyeong-dong Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Since there is a intersection where signal lights and yellow-line lines are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely operating the car line in accordance with the signals indicated by the signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led to the left-hand turn from the right-hand part of the damaged vehicle, which was driven by the victim D(39 years of age) who was going straight from the right-hand part beyond the central line, even though he was in violation of the signal, and did not avoid the car, and did not cause the car to the left-hand part of the damaged vehicle.

In the end, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence, such as the injury of the victim D, such as 'Mak-in and tensions', and the injury of the victim F (the 39 years old), who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, about 4 weeks of medical treatment, such as gambling, kne-in, and knee-in, and knee-in, in detail.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report and a written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow