Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the doctor of the CP hospital located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim D(41) is the employee of the C head office.

On March 16, 2018, at the above hospital around 20:00, the Defendant took a bath while intending to have a dispute over the termination of the contract between the victim and the franchise store, and assaulted the victim by leading the victim's face with an audit failure.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. Around March 16, 2018, the Defendant, at the above hospital around 20:0, 2018, tried to see the victim’s face as a result of the termination of the contract between the victim and the franchise store, and tried to see the victim’s face as an audit plaque, and led the victim’s breath, leading the victim’s breath, thereby damaging the victim’s reputation, etc.

2. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the victim did not receive hospital treatment separately in relation to the above facts charged and did not have any particular impediment in daily life. The above circumstances were naturally cured after about 2 weeks. In addition to the defendant's methods and degree of assault, the victim's body and contents as a result of the above evidence, etc., the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant's above assault committed by the above person was not sufficient to support that the physical condition of the victim was changed due to the victim's physical condition or that there was a defect in the victim's life function, and there is no other evidence to support this.

3. Conclusion.