Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 23, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s duties by asking the Defendant’s wife’s slope E, etc. to ask the Defendant’s wife by asking the police officer’s slope E, etc., belonging to the police box affiliated with the police box, who called “Neat Dok,” in front of the “Curdok-si, Changwon,” located in B, who was called “Curdo-si, Do-si,” and called “Neat Do-si, Do-si, Do-si, Do-si, Do-si, Do-si, Do-si, Do-si.”
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;
1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. A sentence of recommendation that the sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the order to attend a lecture or the order to attend a community service is a person who obstructs the performance of public duties by adding the basic aggravation of the classification of types of crimes to August 1 or June 1 to June 4 of a year: The sentence of recommendation that no relevant person is applicable: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months and six months: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of two years of suspension of execution, two years of a stay of execution, 40 hours in a lecture, and reasons for an increase of 80 hours in a community service: Non-recept of damage and punishment (one time of suspension of the suspension of the execution of narcotics, etc., two times of suspension of the execution of the punishment): Confession, necessity for treatment of the principal offender, family members (two children and two children), etc.;