The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (6 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, and the amount of damage is relatively small.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes again during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime; (b) the Defendant was punished several times for the same crime; (c) the Defendant did not agree with the victims; and (d) did not repay any damage; and (c) there was no special change in circumstances after the pronouncement of the lower judgment; and (d) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant, the lower court’

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.