The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The punishment sentenced by the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The crime of this case is a crime that was acquired with the knowledge of the fact that it was stolen by the mobile phone apparatus of this case, and the criminal act of acquiring stolen goods, such as the crime of this case, is a crime that encourages the principal crime of stolen goods including the crime that stolen another person's name, such as the crime of this case, and thus, the quality of the crime is not good. The quantity of the cell phone apparatus acquired by the defendant through the criminal act of this case is not less than 168, and the quantity of the cell phone apparatus is not less than 168, the mobile phone apparatus acquired by the criminal act of this case is distributed by the large phone, which is highly dangerous to be used for a more serious new crime, and social harm caused by the illegal acquisition or loss of the cell phone is growing, and there is a need to punish the criminal act of acquiring stolen stolen goods, such as this case, and in full view of other similar cases, the equity in sentencing with other similar cases, and various circumstances that are the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the punishment sentenced by the court below is too inappropriate

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.