1. The judgment of the first instance court is modified upon the claim modified by this court as follows.

Defendant B.

1. The reasoning for this part of the reasoning is as follows: (a) the Defendant C’s “Defendant C” as stated in this part is entirely dismissed; and (b) except for any modification or addition below, it is identical to the corresponding column of the judgment of the first instance. Therefore, this is acceptable.

▣ 제1심판결문 5쪽 아래에서 6줄 다음에 “(3) 한편 원고는 2014년 1~2월경부터 2014. 10. 15.까지 이 사건 각 토지에서 토석을 반출하는 작업을 하였다.”를 추가 ▣ 제1심판결문 6쪽 위에서 5줄의 ‘현재 상고심 계속 중이다.’를 ‘대법원은 2017. 9. 26. 망 C의 상고를 기각하는 판결을 선고하였다.’로 수정 ▣ 제1심판결문 6쪽 위에서 5~6줄 사이에 ‘라. 망 C은 2018. 4. 15. 사망하였고, 그 상속인으로는 피고 B과 자녀들인 피고 AA, AB, AC이 있다.’를 추가 ▣ 제1심판결문 6쪽 6~7줄을 ‘[인정 근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제3, 5, 8~10, 28, 42호증, 을 제1, 2호증(가지번호 있는 것은 가지번호 포함, 이하 같다)의 기재, 변론 전체의 취지’로 수정

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. As to whether the instant secondary sales contract is a total contract, the Plaintiff asserts that the instant secondary sales contract is a total contract with a specific amount of KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000, which is the object of the contract. The Defendants asserted that the instant secondary sales contract is a unit price contract with a prior set of only the unit price of earth and rocks, which is to pay to the Defendant B the amount equivalent to the earth

In light of the following circumstances, the evidence No. 14, No. 13, and No. 14, and the entire purport of the argument as seen earlier, it is reasonable to view the second sales contract of this case as the total amount determined in detail as KRW 1.1 billion in cubic meters by the Plaintiff and Defendant B’s 300,000 cubic meters of the earth and rocks loaded or buried in each of the instant land.

① The instant second.