Attached Form

With respect to the accident described in paragraph 1 of the list, the plaintiff is against the defendant based on the insurance specified in paragraph 2 of the attached list.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into an automobile insurance contract with Cworkstren vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”).

B. On January 17, 2019, around 11:30, the Plaintiff’s vehicle transferred a shooting distance D located on the right side of the E apartment site to the right side of the vehicle parked on the right side of the vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”). C. The Plaintiff’s vehicle shocked the Defendant’s right side, which was protruding toward the right side of the vehicle parked on the right side of the road, into a white part (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

The Defendant sustained an injury in the "Akle scarlet" section of the right-hand part of the instant accident.

The plaintiff asserted that he was hospitalized from January 21, 2019 to April 15, 2019, and the plaintiff paid KRW 7,335,300 to the defendant's medical expenses until July 31, 2019.

(d)

As a result of physical appraisal against the defendant, it was found that the defendant's injury to the defendant is very low in relation to the accident of this case, and there was no reduction of labor ability.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, the result of a commission of physical appraisal to the F Hospital Head of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, it is difficult to recognize that there is a debt to the Plaintiff’s Defendant based on the insurance stated in the attached Table No. 2 with respect to the accident listed in the attached Table No. 1, the said debt does not exist.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant of this case against the defendant is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.