Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the corporation B, and the defendant corporation B is the debtor of construction machinery rent of 8.4 million won for the corporation.

1. On December 20, 2016, Defendant A appeared as the representative director of Company B on the date specified in the property specification case No. 2016, 144, which was filed by the above C against Company B as a creditor, as the creditor, and submitted a false list of property without omitting it, even though B had the ownership of D Poter vehicle.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. submitted a false list of assets in the same date and place as that of the above paragraph 1, and in the same manner as that of the Defendant’s representative director, the above Defendant B submitted a false list of assets.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of statutes on the list of property;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 68(10) and 9 of the Civil Execution Act; Selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 68(9) of the Civil Execution Act

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have much value of the vehicle omitted by Defendant A for the reason of sentencing, and was seized in excess of the above amount, the fact that there was no previous conviction of the same kind, the circumstances and results of the crime, and other circumstances shown in the pleadings of the instant case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account.