A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 23, 2016, around 01:15, the injured Defendant: (a) informed 33-3 Don-ro 308, Nam-gu, Southern-gu, Mancheon-ro 308; (b) informed the victim by leaving the windows of a vehicle on which the victim B (40 Don-gu) was on board; (c) provided the victim with the windows of the vehicle on which the victim B (40 Don-gu) had the victim get off the vehicle; and (d) provided the victim’s face by drinking, walking the breast part, walking the breast part, walking the breast part of the plastic material in possession, and laid off the fnch with the victim with approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant damaged property at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph 1, and at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph 1, the Defendant destroyed a 420,000 won or more of the market price he was worn by the victim, and the Defendant destroyed a string of the unclaimed telephone amount in his market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against B and C;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying property and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of concurrent crimes [the scope of the recommended punishment] of the basic area (from April to January 1), (the scope of the recommended punishment] of the first type, the basic area (from April to October 6) of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, and Article 1 of the Reasons for the Sentencing [the scope of the recommended punishment] of Article 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Crimes (the scope of the recommended punishment] of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes: April to 11 [the decision of the sentence] of Article 38 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes; in light of the motive, method, and degree of damage; in light of the fact that the defendant did not make efforts to recover damage; and in consideration of the defendant's age, the defendant's environment, the defendant's criminal conduct, and other circumstances after the crime of this case.