logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.09.19 2017나2062700
사해행위취소
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiffs' primary claims added by this court, shall be modified as follows.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the basic facts is as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is reversed as follows. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

ARTICLE 1-

A. Each real estate listed in the attached Form 2 “each real estate listed in the attached Table” in paragraph 2 shall be “each real estate of this case” and “each real estate of this case.”

"A real estate listed in the Schedule" in Section 1-b.(b) is "each real estate listed in the Schedule" of this case "," each of the real estate "." In Section 1-b., each registration of ownership transfer was completed for each real estate listed in the Schedule on July 20, 2015.

As to the real estate stated in attached Form 1 "B", Suwon District Court, Dongwon District Court, Dongwon Registry, received on July 20, 2015, No. 98101, and as to the real estate stated in the attached Tables No. 2 and 3, the Suwon District Court, the Gyeyang District Court, as to the real estate stated in the attached Tables No. 12394 on July 20, 2015, and as to the real estate stated in the attached Schedules No. 4, the Yangyang District Court, Yangyang District Court, Yangyang District Court, 130146 on July 20, 2015.

hereinafter referred to as "each registration of ownership transfer of this case"

(b)"Flaves";

2. The parties' assertion concerning the primary claim

A. The Plaintiffs’ assertion did not express their intent to donate each of the instant real estate to the Defendants before July 15, 2015, and each of the instant gift contracts was voluntarily made by E and the Defendants after July 15, 2015 when the deceased was in a mixed state, and thus, the registration of each of the instant transfer of ownership should be cancelled as a registration invalidation.

B. On June 4, 2015, the Deceased’s assertion of the Defendants visited the International Certified Judicial Scriveners Office to express his intent to donate each of the instant real estate to the Defendants, and delegated the registration related thereto, and thereafter registered as a matter of preparation of relevant documents and preparation of expenses.

arrow