Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-A-hurd motor vehicle.

On June 7, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 00:18, and proceeded at a speed of 60km from the distance of the street to the body of the front of the new apartment at the speed of 181, the speed of 4 lanes in front of the new apartment at the speed of 181, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and changed the lanes to three lanes.

Since there is another motor vehicle stopping at the front door, there was a duty of care to live well on the front door and the left and right of the motor vehicle driver and to safely proceed according to the traffic situation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and changed the vehicle line into the four-lanes adjacent to the previous one without properly examining the right and the right and the right and the right, and due to the negligence in the course of business, caused the victim D(61 ) who stops on the four-lanes in the front of the last day of the motor vehicle of the Man-do, and continued to stop on the front part of the said Man-do-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wed vehicle.

G 1-2(55) is operated by F(55) as part of the front part of the said A-2 car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a duct, which requires medical treatment for about four weeks, due to the foregoing occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the car to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 21,926,243, such as the exchange of back dubs, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written statement of F and D traffic accidents;

1. Reports (1), (2) on traffic accidents;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance and certificates of subscription to insurance;

1. Written diagnosis (F), written diagnosis (D), and written estimate for vehicle repair;

1. The investigation report (booming video) and one cd (the defendant and the defense counsel asserted that there is no fault of the defendant because the defendant and the defense counsel already interfered with traffic while illegally flying the damaged taxi on the fourth-lane.