The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of the instant crime, the Defendant suffered from depression, etc. and suffered from mental disorder at the time of the instant crime, and was in a state of mental disorder.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. A. The written opinion prepared on June 17, 2019 by the doctor of a X mental hospital in charge of judgment on the claim of mental retardation showed a subjective depression higher than that of the first instance court’s psychological examination conducted on November 5, 2018, and showed intellectual ability corresponding to Grade III intellectual disability 3 with I Q Q 52 and sociality index 68.75. This is deemed to be a lack of the Defendant’s ability to determine whether the Defendant was aware of the lack of the ability to deal with any situation due to intellectual ability corresponding to the level of the second grade of an elementary school (Evidence No. 1 Book No. 304 of the Evidence Records).

그러나 출산 직후인 2019. 5. 27. 07:47경 지인인 D에게 “애기 집에서 낳앗다 놓고 바로 죽엿다 ㅜㅜㅜ 비그치면 묻의로 가야지 ㅠㅠ”, “몸 챙기고.. 그데 아기한테 ㅠㅠ 미안하네.. 다음에는 더 좋은곳에 태어나라고 기도해야겠다 ㅠㅠ”, “나도 고민 계속 하다가 이럿케 까지 왓다 아빠 산소에 묻어 조야지 ㅠㅠ”라고 문자메시지를 전송한 점(증거기록 제1책 제1권 323쪽 수사보고, 해당 문자메시지는 증거기록 제3책 제3권에 있음) 등을 비롯하여 피고인이 범행에 이르게 된 경위, 범행의 수단과 방법, 범행 전후에 보인 피고인의 행동 등을 종합하여 보면, 피고인이 당시 사물을 변별할 능력이나 의사를 결정할 능력이 미약한 상태에 이르렀다고 보이지는 않는다.

Therefore, mental disability claim is not accepted.

(b).