1. The Plaintiff, the shares of Defendant B, and the shares of Defendant C, the shares of 3/5, and the shares of 2/5, are 748 square meters of Gyeonggi-do.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 21, 2015, the Plaintiff purchased 748m2 in Suwon District Court E Real Estate auction case with Non-Party F and completed the registration of ownership transfer on a joint basis with Non-Party F.

B. However, on November 2013, Non-Party G, the former owner of the above land, removed a building on the above land, and acquired ownership by constructing a light steel frame board board and a single floor (office, etc.) on the ground of approximately 83 square meters on the part of the land located within the scope of a foreign organization, which successively connected each point of the above land among the above land after the decision to voluntarily commence the auction was rendered, in order to consecutively connect each point of 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, and1.

C. On March 14, 2015, G died, and Nonparty H and I, his children, filed a declaration of renunciation of inheritance with the Suwon District Court 2015Ra776, and the said report was accepted, and Defendant B and Defendant C, his mother, jointly inherited the deceased’s property as 2/5 shares, respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-4, Eul 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants are obligated to remove a building on the ground of 83 square meters in the part of a corporation which is located within the scope of a ship and to deliver the said part of land to the Plaintiff seeking the removal of interference and the transfer of land based on the ownership of the land, and to remove a building on the ground of 83 square meters in the part of a corporation located within the scope of a corporation which is located within the scope of a corporation, which connects each point of 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 1 of the attached drawing among 748 square meters in

B. As to the determination of Defendant B’s assertion, Defendant B’s claim was accepted, and as such, Defendant B’s claim was alleged to the effect that the Plaintiff’s claim was unreasonable. Thus, according to the Plaintiff’s statement 2-1, Defendant B’s report on the inheritance limited recognition as the Suwon District Court 2015Ra77, and Defendant B’s report on the inheritance limited recognition was accepted on July 27, 2015, and Defendant B’s liability is within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased G.