Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2015, the defendant driving a B B B-Ma T-M-W-on vehicle, and led the front road in front of the Incheon Southern-gu, Incheon to turn to the left in the direction of the East-dong apartment from the south-dong high level direction.

at the time the victim D(54) was driving

E High typ vehicles are directly driving in the direction of the South East Eastern Industrial Complex in the direction of the South East East East Eastern Industrial Complex, and are driving the Victim F(30 tax).

G Habn-tur passenger vehicle was stopped in order to circumvent it to the right side of the south side from the East apartment direction, and its location is a place where traffic is controlled by traffic by installing signal, etc., so the defendant engaged in driving duty has been negligent in complying with the direction of the signal, and due to the negligence of violating the signal and making the left-hand turn to the front part of the driver's vehicle, and caused collision between India's boundary and fire hydrants by pushing ahead of the front part of the driver's vehicle, and the front part of the part of the vehicle, and suffered from the victim D such as an injury, such as a catus catus, etc., which requires approximately 8 weeks of treatment for the left-hand side of the vehicle, and approximately 2 weeks of treatment for the victim D, the Habn-tur-tur passenger, the above part of the vehicle, as the front part, suffered from the injury of the victim, such as H 32 years old, I (I), 45 years old, and 28 years old.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F or D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of favorable circumstances among the following grounds for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the type of decision] of the Criminal Act for traffic accidents in general shall be the area where recommendations are made.