All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed). The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. Examining the reasoning of the judgment below as to Defendant A’s grounds for appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below and the first instance court, the court below was just in finding Defendant A guilty of the facts charged in this case for the reasons stated in its holding, and there was no error of law by misapprehending the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of Defendant C’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court is justifiable to have found Defendant C guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime of receiving bribe in violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence and experience, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime of receiving bribe, without failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.