A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

On April 19, 2017, at around 22:00, the Defendant injected Ccom 604, which is a local mental medicine, into a single-use injection machine, approximately 0.03g of Mesophical medicine, and injected into one’s arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. A statement on narcotics appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (verification of a surcharge);

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Orders to observe protection and attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The basic area (from October to two years) of the sentencing criteria (the scope of the recommended punishment) (the scope of the recommended punishment) and the basic area (the items (b) and (c) of the said items) of the three types, including medication and simple possession, etc.;

2. The decision-making defendant, who recognized the crime of this case, reflects the wrong determination, and seems to be hardening that he will cut narcotics and live a new life in the future. Although the defendant had the same criminal record but for whom 8 years have passed, he/she will suspend the execution of imprisonment only once in consideration of the fact that he/she had been sentenced to imprisonment. It is so decided as per Disposition.