A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 4, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the Seoul Western District Court on imprisonment with prison labor on August 4, 2010, and the same criminal records are more than once.

1. On October 18, 2014, at around 19:35, the Defendant: (a) sent the victim at the marina room of the trade name called “E” in the victim D (the 59 years of age, the 59) operation of the first floor of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building; (b) it is necessary to pay the victim the width, b. inside and outside of the family; and (c) the victim confirmed that there is no money; and (d) the victim confirmed that there was no money, and (e) the victim was frighted several times to the victim of the vehicle, “the victim of the vehicle: (a) this Chewing, why the police was fluent, and the b.b. b. b. b. b. c.,

The Defendant, as such, 50,00 won was delivered to the victim who frightened the victim and frightened.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by threatening the victim.

2. The Defendant, at around 15:00 as of October 2013, 201, put the victim into a marina room as stated in paragraph 1, “the above victim was breath of “the above Chewing baby, the money inside and outside of the city require a tea.”

The Defendant, as such, was delivered 20 million won from the victim who frightened the victim and frightened the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to F and G by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Among concurrent crimes, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act committed the instant crime even though the Defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence due to the concurrent crimes under similar veterinary laws, and the Defendant committed the instant crime, which has been punished due to interference with business, etc.