logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.27 2014구합1918
처분취소청구
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On September 16, 2010, the Plaintiff was sentenced to seven years of imprisonment with prison labor for special robbery, etc. by the Gwangju High Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive at that time, and is currently being admitted to the Sinpo Prison.

On September 23, 2014, at around 08:15, the Plaintiff instructed a prisoner to pass again with two newspapers on his hand in the process of going through the goods inspection machine installed in front of six common gates. The Plaintiff passed through the inspection machine of goods at a less than 10% of “I am spath, spath, spath, spath, and spath, spath, spath, and 1, spath, spath, spath, spath, and 1, spath, spath, spath, spath, spath, spath, 15, spath, spath, spath, 15, spath, spath, spath, spath, 5, and 1, spath, spath, 6, and 1, spath, 201.”

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary measure” (hereinafter “instant disciplinary measure”). Inasmuch as there is no dispute, the entry of the instant evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the Plaintiff’s assertion of the purport of the entire pleadings, and the Plaintiff’s assertion of relevant laws and regulations are unlawful for the following reasons, the Plaintiff’s claim for the instant disciplinary measure is unlawful. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s primary invalidation

In violation of the Administrative Procedures Act, the defendant violated the procedure.

arrow