All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for appeal by the defendant against the plaintiffs of the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts dismissed or added as set forth in the following 2.1. Therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. Parts to be removed or added;

A. The height of the judgment of the court of first instance refers to the attached Form 6 of the judgment of the court of second instance as the attached Form 2.

B. The following is added to the portion of the first instance judgment, which is the third place of the third place of the first instance judgment:

The above evidence and evidence Nos. 4 and 12-16 each statement (including serial numbers) are as follows. In other words, the defendant reported the right of retention on the ground that the defendant reported the right of retention on November 23, 2017 to the compulsory auction procedure with respect to each of the land of this case on the ground that "the construction cost of KRW 30 million was entrusted to the construction work", and ② on October 15, 2018, the defendant entered into a lease contract with D husband, made a improvement and repair of each of the land of this case at the defendant's expense, and made settlement of construction cost at the time of delivery, after selling and selling each of the land of this case at the defendant's expense; ③ D is aware that the defendant used each of the land of this case without compensation, and demanded compensation for possession without permission, and it appears that the defendant remitted KRW 1.5 million to the defendant."

3. Conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant should be accepted in its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified in its conclusion, and all appeals against the plaintiffs are dismissed.