logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2018.03.08 2017고단1197
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year;

The above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an operator of the game "E" in the original state D, and the defendant B is an employee in charge of the exchange affairs in the above game.

Defendant

A from September 14, 2017 to December 23 of the same month, from around September 14, 2017, up to 50 days from the said game head, a large number of unspecified customers who set up 50 games of “New Spanish game” and found the game, and Defendant B exchanged the game scores of customers who completed the game into KRW 9,000 per 10,000.

As a result, Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Statement made by the police concerning the name of the handicapped;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the internal investigation report (6) and each investigation report (10,11,16)

1. Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry; Articles 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Protective observation and community service order (defendant A) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act (Defendant A)

1. Defendant A [Scope of Recommendation] No. 2 types (business of arranging exchange, arranging exchange, and re-purchase) including the provision of illegal game water (business of arranging exchange) and no basic area (6 months to one year and six months) (a person who is subject to special sentencing)

2. Defendant B [Scope of Recommendation]’s simple participation in the mitigation area ( April-10 to October) of Class B (Business of arranging exchange, arranging exchange and repurchase of money) for the use of illegal games.

3. The crime of this case by which Defendant A and Defendant B, a game room business owner, conspired to exchange game outcome results to customers, and the crime of this case is not easy in light of the period of crime, the number of game instruments, the size of business place, etc.

On the other hand, however,

arrow