(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.11.07 2018고단270

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.11.07 2018고단270

사기등

Text

Imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes No. 1 and No. 2 in the judgment of the defendant, and for the crimes No. 3, 4, and 5 in the judgment of the defendant, one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 31, 2018, the defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months in Seoul Southern District Court for fraud, etc. on February 8, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 8, 2018.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On September 27, 2017, the Defendant called “the Defendant would sell another 6 supplementary system if he remitted KRW 50,000 to the victim C, who posted a letter on the purchase of goods on the Internet NAV in a high-tech foreign car page.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the supplementary system.

Nevertheless, on September 28, 2017, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 50,000 won from the victim to the new financial investment account in the name of the defendant on September 28, 2017.

2. On October 12, 2017, the Defendant contacted the victim D, who posted a letter on the purchase of goods on the Internet NAV and a foreign car page, and called “in case of remitting KRW 83,000, the Defendant would sell an ombudsman’s automobile wheel.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell nitrot.

Nevertheless, on October 12, 2017, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 83,000 won from the victim to the new financial investment account in the name of the defendant on October 12, 2017.

"2018 Highest 4522"

3. On April 18, 2018, the Defendant posted a notice to the NAV Rober’s Republic of Korea “Sales of Telecommunications Shirts,” and said, the Defendant said that the Defendant would deliver Trts to the victim E who contacted the said notice “78,000 won upon deposit of KRW 78,00,000.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to send the goods according to the promise even if he receives the payment of the goods from the injured party, such as selling the Dorts already to another person and not holding the goods.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim, and is the same day as the victim.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고단1292

-수원지방법원 2018.10.18 2018고단1772

-제주지방법원 2017.09.06 2017고단207

-수원지방법원 2016.02.17 2015고단4734

-서울남부지방법원 2018.04.12 2017고단2191