logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.06.18 2014고단844
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 29, 2014, at around 00:05, Defendant A found the Defendant, who was under patrol at the front of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Western Police Station E District E District of Seoul Western Police Station, while carrying out the patrol, and obstructed the legitimate performance of police officers’ duties related to police officers’ patrol duties by assaulting the said F and G shoulderers, with a defect slope F and G police officers, who are in charge of carrying out the patrol.

2. At the beginning date and time of the preceding paragraph, the Defendant arrested the above F and G, who are the Defendant’s daily behaviors, as an act of obstructing the performance of official duties, and obstructed the legitimate performance of police officers’ duties regarding the arrest of a flagrant offender by assaulting the Defendant, such as “I, Chewing feasia, feasia, feasia, feasia, feasia, feasia, feasia, feasia, and feasia,” and “I, feasia, feasia, feasia, feasia, and feasia.” The Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the arrest of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes under relevant Articles of the Criminal Act;

1. The defense counsel's assertion of defense counsel under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution argues to the effect that the Defendants were in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder by drinking alcohol at the time of the crime in this case. Thus, according to the above evidence, it seems that the Defendants were aware that they had drinking to a certain extent at the time of the crime in this case, but did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions.

arrow