1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

. Dor: Not less than 2 (Cr. 10 degrees , 0 degrees , 10 degrees , 4 (C. 10 degrees , 10 degrees , 5 (C. 10 degrees , 10 degrees , 0 degrees ), 5 (C. : 10 degrees , 0 degrees : 140 degrees : Competence measurement - 140 degrees : 55 degrees : 55 degrees 3): 50 degrees : 20 degrees - 9 degree : 9 degree : 40 degree : 40 degree : 92 degree : 40 degree : 40 degree , 50 degree : 402 : 9 degree : 502 : 8 degree : 902 : 40 degree : 402 : 92222 : 40 degree : 5222 : 40 degree : 522 mal. : mal. -2 : -2

C. On December 18, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition of re-determination of the disability grade No. 14 subparag. 10 [the remaining members of the State Department] according to the result of the measurement.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【No dispute exists, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s disability state of the Plaintiff’s assertion should be determined by the method of active exercise. (2) Even though the degree of disability should be determined by the method of passive exercise. (3) The instant disposition that judged the disability grade as a result of the measurement is unlawful.

B. The main text of Article 47(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act provides that the degree of physical function disorder shall be the average of the physical area of the worker in question measured by “the method determined by the Corporation” among the methods of the AMA (AMA) type measurement in E.M., and attached Table 4.