logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.09.19 2015구단58143
국가유공자 및 보훈보상대상자 요건 비해당결정처분취소
Text

1. On June 2, 2015, the decision that the Defendant rendered against the Plaintiff was revoked.

2...

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On April 10, 2014, the Plaintiff’s husband, worked as D Commissioner, and around 17:00, on April 10, 2014, the Plaintiff died by marble damage on the head, etc. of the apartment entrance, coming from hallway stairs between 13 and 14 floors in Gangnam-gu Seoul, where the Plaintiff and the deceased’s family members live.

The Plaintiff asserted that “the deceased was affected by depression due to overwork and stress in the line of duty, and died due to suicide,” and filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State (bereaved family members) pursuant to Article 4(1)14 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons of Distinguished Services to the State”). On June 2, 2015, the Defendant rendered non-specific decisions and non-specific decisions on the requirements of persons of distinguished services to the State on the ground that “the deceased died due to the State’s security or the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the protection of the people’s lives and property, or it is difficult to deem that there is proximate causal relation with the performance of official duties (hereinafter

【In the absence of dispute, there is a proximate causal link between the Plaintiff’s occupational stress and the outbreak and death of the deceased’s assertion as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate or not, as stated in Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 9, and 12, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the prior disposition of this case on a different premise is unlawful.

Facts of recognition

1) The Deceased’s career and family relation status as the Deceased) passed the 24th administrative senior notification around 1980, and continued to work in the general office, etc., and served as a public official belonging to D on August 26, 1985.

B. Since the deceased was promoted to an Inspector around June 1995, he was promoted to the Director around April 200, around December 2003, around December 2003, the Director General of the Grade II, around July 2007, around July 2007, and around April 201, and the deceased was promoted to G.

arrow