The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, due to the summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant are that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the mistake, and that there is no record of punishment or punishment exceeding the fine for the same kind of crime.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the amount of damage caused by the instant crime is not a small amount; (b) the amount of damage was paid to the victim or did not reach an agreement with the victim; (c) the lower court appears to have determined the sentence by fully taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant; and (d) there was no change of circumstances that may vary from the lower court’s judgment and the punishment; (b) the result of the application of the sentencing guidelines by the Sentencing Committee (the scope of recommending punishment: between April and April of imprisonment and other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, background, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (c) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.