A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence No. 4 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, under the direction of the Defendant, withdrawn the money deposited by the Defendant for the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the

1. On August 23, 2017, the person who was dissatisfyed may post a telephone to the victim C in an unsatisfyed place on August 23, 2017 as the agent of the KB National Bank, and may cause the loan to KRW 30 million.

In order to lend a masp loan, the credit rating shall be increased once, and when the credit rating is raised, the existing loan shall be repaid with the first loan at other places.

It shall send money to an account with a loan;

In the event that a loan is repaid, it was falsely stated that the loan will be repaid at that time.

However, in fact, the person under whose name was not the representation of the KB National Bank, and send a Boscing organization with money from the injured party.

I thought to use.

On the same day from the person who deceivings the victim, and was transferred KRW 10 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (E) in the name of the victim, and ordered the said D to withdraw KRW 9 million from the Home Plus office located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Seoul on August 23, 2017, and had the Defendant deliver it to the Defendant. The Defendant transferred KRW 8.9 million to the Trus bank account in the name of the victim in accordance with the order of the victim in the name of the above.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above person who did not receive the above name, received the remittance of KRW 10 million by deceiving the victim as above.

2. On August 25, 2017, the person who was dissatisfyed with the above name was called the victim F at around 09:00, and was in the same place as the public prosecutor’s office’s office’s employee, and “the bank account was used as the bank account with the Internet which was used as the bank account with the largeest national fraud case.”