The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the lower court’s punishment (4 million won of fine) is too large.

2. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the principle of trial priority and the principle of directness on the market, has a unique area of sentencing in the first instance, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In full view of the reasons for sentencing revealed in the oral argument in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable and thus, it cannot be said that the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, taking account of the following: (a) there is no significant change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the lower court, as the materials for new sentencing have not been submitted; and (b) the grounds for sentencing revealed in the course of the oral argument in the instant case (the criminal records having been punished several times due to a

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit and thus dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.