A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On January 26, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Labor Standards Act at the Ulsan District Court on January 26, 2017 and was sentenced to two years of suspended execution on February 3, 2017.

1. A foreigner who intends to find a job in the Republic of Korea shall obtain the qualification for sojourn eligible for employment activities, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and no person shall employ any person who does not have the qualification for sojourn accordingly;

On January 28, 2016, the Defendant hired 12 foreigners who are not qualified to engage in job-seeking activities, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 2 from around that time to May 28, 2016 (the list of foreigners in violation of the Immigration Control Act) from around January 28, 2016, who run D companies of vessel material manufacturing business, and who are qualified to engage in job-seeking activities, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 3 (the list of foreigners subject to the Immigration Control Act).

"2016 Highest 4243"

2. On January 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) at a restaurant operated by the Victim G in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, the Defendant is working for the victim as the principal of H H H’s subordinate business; (b) on the part of the victim, the Defendant supplied the employee’s meals to the workplace on credit, the Defendant would pay the employee’s meals at once later

‘False speech' was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any property owned by the company that was operated in around 2009 after the default. Since the unpaid wage for workers was in excess of the debt amounting to about 89 million won, there was no intent or ability to pay the said price even if the Defendant was provided food from the injured party. In particular, even if the Defendant received the payment of the construction cost after entering the country around that time, even if he received the payment of the construction cost and received the payment of the construction cost at low prices, the Defendant repeated the Defendant’s act of not paying food expenses at all for the employees’ wages and the restaurant located

The Defendant, from January 201 to May 201, 201, was provided with food equivalent to KRW 6.2 million at the market price.