Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 18, 2013, around 09:15, the Defendant demanded an interview from the head of the Gu to the third floor of the Gangnam-gu Office Samsungdong 16-1, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, due to noise and construction noise, and received a demand from the majority employees, such as the victim C, who is an employee of the Gu office, by avoiding disturbance.

However, the defendant did not comply with it and did not leave the country for about 35 minutes while avoiding a disturbance by 09:50 on the same day.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

2. On June 24, 2013, at around 09:05, the Defendant demanded an interview from the head of the Gu for the same reason at the place prescribed in the preceding paragraph (1), and received a demand for delivery from many employees, such as victims C, etc., who are employees of the Gu office.

However, the defendant did not comply with it and did not leave for about 40 minutes while avoiding disturbance by putting a large amount of interest from around 09:45 on the same day.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

3. The Defendant, at around 09:40 on July 3, 2013, demanded an interview from the head of the Gu for the same reason at the place prescribed in the preceding paragraph (1), and received a demand for delivery from many employees, such as victims C, etc., who are employees of the Gu office.

However, the defendant did not respond to it and did not leave for about 40 minutes while avoiding disturbance by 10:20 on the same day.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

4. On July 19, 2013, the Defendant demanded an interview from the head of the Gu for the same reason at the place set forth in the preceding paragraph (1) around 09:16, and received a demand for delivery from many employees, such as victims C, etc., who are employees of the Gu office, by avoiding disturbances, such as sub-marketing and blaging on the corridor.

However, the defendant did not comply with it and did not leave for about 24 minutes while avoiding disturbance by 09:40 on the same day.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. CCTV photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 319 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 and Article 38 of the Criminal Code to increase concurrent crimes.