1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts (applicable for recognition: Fact that there is no dispute, each entry in Gap evidence 1 through 3, and purport of the whole pleadings);

A. The deceased F (hereinafter “the deceased”) was between G and the couple who completed the marriage report on October 29, 1964. Around October 23, 1986, the couple was divorced by a divorce trial final and conclusive around October 23, 1986, and married with the Plaintiff on December 4, 1986.

The Deceased had Defendant B and C as his child between G and his child, and had D and E as his child between the Plaintiff and his child.

B. On April 1, 200, the Deceased registered a motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”) as its owner.

C. The Deceased died on February 3, 2007, and the Plaintiff, D, E, and Defendant B and C were co-inheritors.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendants under Seoul Eastern District Court 2014Kadan51696, stating that “the Defendants jointly with the Plaintiff, D, and E for the registration of cancellation on the instant automobile” (hereinafter “instant previous case”), and “1. The Defendants actively cooperate with the Defendants on January 16, 2015 in the cancellation of the automobile scrapping.

2. Subject to the implementation of the foregoing Paragraph (1), all expenses incurred in the scrapping of the instant motor vehicle and taxes and fines for negligence on the said motor vehicle shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3. The plaintiff waives the remaining claims.

‘Adjustment' has been concluded with the content thereof.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion and the Defendants jointly inherited the instant automobile following the death of F.

The automobile of this case is so long as it is currently difficult to operate.

The Plaintiff and the Defendants voluntarily adjusted the contents that the Defendants actively cooperate in the cancellation of the automobile scrapping.

Nevertheless, the Defendants did not cooperate with the cancellation of the automobile scrapping so far, so they are not scrapped.

Therefore, it is true.