1. The defendant transferred 27,500 registered common shares of C issuance to the plaintiff, and the defendant transferred 27,500 common shares to the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 3, 2015, F is a person who established C (hereinafter “C”) with D as well as D on August 3, 2015, and was held by F, 9,900 shares of 10,000 shares issued C, and 100 shares of F, and the Plaintiff is a person who was in de facto marital relationship with F, and the Defendant is a person who was in de facto marital relationship with F.

B. On November 23, 2015, F of F’s recording, at the attendance of Defendant, D, Attorneys-at-law, G, C head H, and I, F of F of F, gave a testament by means of a recording to the effect that “5% of the C issued shares is the Defendant, 20% is D, 20% is distributed to I, 5% is distributed to J, and 5% is distributed to the Defendant” (hereinafter “instant will”), and bequeathed C of 5,00 shares to the Defendant.

C. F’s death and waiver of K’s inheritance died on November 24, 2015, and at the time, K was both the Plaintiff and K as the heir of the net F (hereinafter “the deceased”). However, on February 22, 2016, K reported the renunciation of inheritance to the Seoul Family Court, and on June 24, 2016, K was accepted.

1) On December 8, 2015, the Plaintiff, who did not receive a gift or testamentary gift from the deceased, filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the will of this case against the Defendant, D, I, and J on December 8, 2015, and on May 19, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking partial refund of C shares issued by the testament of this case against the Defendant, D, I, and J (hereinafter “instant legal reserve”).

(2) On August 12, 2016, the Plaintiff withdrawn the primary claim seeking confirmation of invalidity of the instant will. On August 16, 2016, this court rendered a ruling of recommending reconciliation with the content that “The Plaintiff, the Defendant, the Defendant, the 27,500 shares issued C, D, and I, each 10,00 shares issued C, the J transferred C shares by September 30, 2016, and the transfer by September 30, 2016, and notified C of the transfer.”

3) The D, I, and J did not raise an objection, and the decision to recommend the above reconciliation became final and conclusive, but the defendant raised an objection against the above decision to recommend the reconciliation on September 6, 2016 (the fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition;