1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;

2. The plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation part.

1. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows.

At the time of the accident, on January 8, 2018, at the time of the accident, the part of the left side of the defendant insured vehicle A (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant vehicle") of the insured vehicle of the defendant insured vehicle of the defendant insured vehicle of the defendant insured vehicle of the insurance relationship with the insurance vehicle of the defendant at the time of the accident refers to the amount reduced in the course of the payment of the 307,080,000 won self-payment of the insured self-payment of the insured vehicle of self-payment of the insured vehicle of the security vehicle of the automobile of the defendant insured vehicle of the insurance vehicle of the 320 Do Do Do Do 320 (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff vehicle") in the situation of the collision with the 320 Do Do Do 320 from the two lanes of the four-lane road of the Do Do

4,980 won (based on recognition), each entry in Gap evidence 1 through 8, Eul evidence 1 through 5 (including each number for those with additional numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings, without a dispute

2. The plaintiff asserts that the accident in this case occurred due to the unilateral negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle who changed the course from the four lanes to the three lanes after the plaintiff's vehicle completed the change of course from the two lanes to the three lanes among the four lanes in letter, and then the accident in this case claimed the total insurance money paid by the plaintiff and the damages for delay from the day after the final payment date.

First, we examine the argument that the defendant vehicle changed the course from the fourth to the third fourth lane on the day immediately before the accident in this case.

Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as seen earlier, it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s vehicle at the time of the instant accident was in the process of changing the course from the fourth to the third fourth, and it is reasonable to view that the said vehicle was in a straight position in

- According to the plaintiff's black image (Evidence A7), the fact that the defendant's vehicle passes through the four-way line on the right side of the defendant's vehicle immediately after the accident in this case can be confirmed.