(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.02.24 2016고단4130

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.02.24 2016고단4130

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), a summary order of KRW 6 million for the same crime at the Seoul Central District Court on September 10, 2010, and a summary order of KRW 7 million for the same crime at the Seoul Central District Court on January 15, 2013, respectively.

Criminal facts

1. On October 3, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.206% during blood transfusion around 01:08, the Defendant driven a DNA low-income vehicle at approximately 10km from the front side of the main car in the airbing in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the front side of the Dagdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Change-si, and around 10km away from the front side of the main car in the airbing in Gangdong-gu, Gangdong-gu, Seoul.

2. On October 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 01:20 on October 3, 2016, the Defendant: (b) was driving under the influence of alcohol as set forth in the foregoing paragraph (1) at Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (c) was fluored to the right side of the passenger car; and (d) was dispatched to the site upon receipt of a 112 report; and (c) was sufficiently under the circumstances, the Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi Police Station Earbman F, who was called to the site upon receipt of a 112 report, presented his license to the Defendant to measure drinking, demanded to inform his personal details to request the Defendant to leave his arms to leave the site; and (d) was able to take one time the Defendant’s arms to leave the site; and (d) the F was obstructed by the police officer’s legitimate arrest and treatment of the Defendant’s face to arrest the offender with an intention to obstruct the Defendant’s performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement of H and G;

1. Statement report on the circumstances of the driver of a vehicle driving, inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking driving, report on the traffic accident (1) and report on the traffic accident (2)

1. Notification to a department related to reporting 112 cases;

1. The number of persons subject to measurement of alcohol, photographs of suspects, and photographs of damaged parts of the crime;

1. Judgment.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.10.12 2018고단1589

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.03.16 2017고단42

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.08.17 2016고단456

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.11.28 2017고단2345

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.10.19 2017고단2093