beta
Text
The Defendants, not guilty, dismissed the application for compensation by the applicant for compensation.
Reasons
1. Defendant A is a representative of H that promotes the commercialization of “G” technology, and Defendant B [U.S. name I] is a joint representative of K Co., Ltd. established with A and J, who is a U.S. citizen with the intent to commercialize and sell the said technology.
Defendant
On October 2010, at the H office of Defendant A’s operation of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M building No. 207, Defendant A recommended investment by stating that “The G technology made in-house is more than 20 registered patents,” while running as if the patent right is maintained in the present time, while indicating that the patent is maintained in the above office wall.”
However, in fact, the patent right that Defendant A holds with respect to the above G technology cannot be registered as the same invention again because it was impossible to pay a patent registration fee or has already been extinguished, and as for the invention, anyone can use it, so that he/she can not claim an exclusive right of patent, and even if so, he/she applies for another patent right of the same kind improved.
Even if the required period is equivalent to 15 months, there is no particular business value at the time of the investment.
Nevertheless, the defendant A, as such, by deceiving the victim L as such, obtained money from the victim L as an investment deposit on or around December 3, 2010 and acquired money from the victim.
B. On May 1, 201, Defendant A recommended the victim F to make an investment in the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) to the victim F at the beginning of May 201, stating, “An empty technology is the first patent in the world where there are 19 patents, no one is capable of living, and a wind power generation device using G is installed in the Overcheon Science Museum until June 15, 201. The Defendant B recommended the victim F to make an investment, stating, “No one is any of the H’s liabilities, and there is no office rent.” The Defendant B also made the victim F a close range of KRW 100 million.