1. The defendant shall pay 249,200,000 won to the plaintiff and 24% per annum from December 31, 2008 to the day of complete payment.

The evidence No. 1 (the defendant acknowledged the authenticity at the second date for pleading, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that the recognition of the establishment was contrary to the truth and due to mistake, and the above revocation is not effective) and evidence No. 2 (the authenticity of the whole document is presumed to be established since there is no dispute as to the part of the defendant's seal). Accordingly, the defendant alleged that the above seal was affixed by another person, who is not the defendant, and the above document was forged, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and the above assertion is without merit). In full view of the whole purport of the arguments in each statement No. 3 through No. 5, from June 4, 2007 to July 13, 207, the plaintiff lent the total amount of KRW 92 million to the defendant by lending it to the account in the name of D Hospital (the above assertion that the plaintiff lent KRW 500,000,000 to the defendant at the time of borrowing KRW 600,000,000,000).

(2) The Plaintiff, on July 13, 2007, transferred only KRW 5.2 million to the Defendant’s account from the Plaintiff’s mother C’s account to the Defendant’s account on July 13, 2007, and thereafter, the Plaintiff should be deemed to have lent only KRW 9.2 million to the Defendant ( KRW 5.2 million). Moreover, from August 3, 2007 to September 28, 2007, the Plaintiff transferred the total amount of KRW 145 million to the Defendant’s account using the Plaintiff’s mother C or the Plaintiff’s wife E account in five times from September 3, 2007, and thereafter.