Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 10, 2017, at around 23:10, the Defendant driven a B-to-purd motor vehicle with approximately 2km alcohol concentration of about 0.123% in the 2km section from the front day of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Mau apartment, to the front day of the 84-ro B-to-be culture of the same Gu Songdo, from the front day of the apartment, to the front day of the 84-oto-bed apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiry into the results of crackdown on driving alcohol and notification of the results of crackdown on driving alcohol (electronicized documents);

1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver's license in the main place;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (main driver's circumstantial reports and digitalization documents);

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, once again driven alcohol despite the fact that he/she had been punished by a fine due to driving of drinking around 2015.

The drinking volume of the accused has also reached a considerable level. Considering the social risk of drinking driving, the accused's liability cannot be deemed to be somewhat weak.

However, the defendant shows the form of recognizing and opposing the crime in this court.

From the point of control, the Defendant actively cooperatedd with the police officer's demand for measurement, and showed a strong reflective attitude.

Although the defendant has been sentenced to one time to drive alcohol, there is no other history of criminal punishment.

The defendant seems to have lived as a sincere member of society.

After committing a crime, the Defendant disposed of a vehicle and is commuting to and from work by means of gambling and public transportation.

The statement is made to the effect that he/she is living together with his/her liabilities, etc.

In light of the defendant's legal attitude and the fact that it is repeated that the defendant will not repeat the crime in the future, there is a normal appearance.

Since it appears, the defendant is the defendant.