All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence (Defendant A: imprisonment of three years, additional collection of 208,050,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment of three years, additional collection of 229,60,000 won) declared by the lower court to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment. The crime of this case is deemed to have been received large amounts of money exceeding KRW 500 million from K, which is the son of the J, in the name of soliciting and arranging the prosecution investigators, etc. so that the Defendants may be subject to a non-detained investigation. The crime of this case is very poor; the crime is deemed to have been strictly punished as impairing the public trust in relation to the purchase of the fair performance in performing official duties; and K seeks a strict punishment against the Defendants; and there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared with the court below; in full view of the various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the circumstances and means of the crime of this case, and there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions, and thus, each sentence imposed by the court below to the Defendants is unfair. Thus, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.