The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (an improper sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (an amount of KRW 5 million, KRW 40 hours for sexual assault treatment programs, and two years for information disclosure) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is a recipient of basic living and is receiving the treatment of alcohol dependence after the instant case, and the victim expressed in this court that the defendant does not want to be punished again.

However, it is difficult to regard the case committed by the defendant who has had the record of punishment for sexual crimes several times in the past as a simple deviation, and the victim expresses his intention not to punish, but it seems to have caused a big insult and sense of shame.

In addition, considering the equity between the punishment of similar cases in all the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, it cannot be said that the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.