logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.04.30 2019고정143
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving B taxi.

On September 29, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 00:36, and led to the intersection of the “C” apartment distance in front of the Ulsan-gu, to the direction from the ethalian to the ethal of salary.

Since there is a three-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, the defendant had a duty of care to observe signals, etc. while accurately operating the operation and steering gear, and to proceed along the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim D (the aged 51) who had the said three-distance intersection to turn to the left at the headquarters of the Ulsan Water Services and Waterworks, from the bewing-distance on the right side of the said three-distance intersection by failing to comply with the signal, and caused the victim D (the aged 51) to go to the left part of the left part of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the said string.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F (n, 23 years of age) who is a passenger of the above taxi due to the above occupational negligence, such as a hot spring in which there is no open two rooms in need of treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. A medical certificate (F);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the report on the occurrence of traffic accidents, the report on actual condition investigation, and the report on investigation (for signals at the time of accident);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution recognizes and reflects his/her own mistake, the error that the driver of the other vehicle drives under the influence of alcohol is the main cause of the accident, the insurance processing and the damage has been recovered considerably, and the defendant is punished by a fine for a violation of the Road Act around 2003.

arrow