A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 10, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000 won by the court of the same on July 16, 200, by committing a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Bone Star Co., Ltd.

On November 23, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 06:55% of blood alcohol content, driven the said fluencing vehicle with the above 0.138% of alcohol content, led to the Defendant’s operation of the said flucing vehicle on the national highway No. 42, in front of the leuk-si average rest area in the south side of Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si, along one lane from the direction of the flucing parallel parallel to the direction of the flu

At the same time, the center line of the yellow-ray is installed as a bend, and since the surface was iced, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as reducing speed and safely manipulating the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive normally due to such influence of alcohol as above and neglected to do so, and was negligent in the course of the centering on the center line, and received the parts adjacent to the left-hand side of the DTC Cargo Driving by the victim C(the age of 37) who was drinking in the opposite part, as the Defendant was driving in front of the left-hand side of the DTC Freight.

As a result, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as finites that need to be treated for about two weeks, and suffered injury to the victim E (the age of 51) who was driven by the Defendant on the finite vehicle, such as a string wall of a chest gum that requires to be treated for about two weeks. The Defendant again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol as a person who violated the prohibition of driving at least two times under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A report on detection of a drinking driver, and a suspect's mark of the investigation report;