1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: The defendant's assertion and determination of "E" as "D" is the same as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal as follows; 2) the defendant's assertion and determination that this case's agreement is not subject to a claim for revocation of fraudulent act; 3) the defendant asserts that this case's agreement was concluded as part of the renunciation of inheritance, and thus, it does not constitute a juristic act for the purpose of property right subject to revocation of fraudulent act. On the other hand, the agreement on division of inherited property does not constitute a juristic act for the purpose of revocation of inheritance, since the agreement on division of inherited property is concluded as part of the waiver of inheritance, and the ownership of inherited property becomes final and conclusive by either the heir's sole ownership of each heir or performing its terms as a new co-inheritors, and thus, it does not constitute a juristic act for the purpose of revocation of inheritance rights (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Da17279, Feb. 29, 2001).