(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.08 2015나20017

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.08 2015나20017

손해배상(자)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the pertinent part of the reasoning of the judgment, and thus, it shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

(3:7) 2. The scope of the plaintiff's liability for damages shall be the same as each corresponding item of the attached Table of the calculation of damages in addition to the following separate statements concerning the plaintiff's amount of damages, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

The term "basic matters" in the attached Form for calculation of personal information damages

(The name of the plaintiff shall be deemed to exceed 65.5% of the normal person, and the date at which the name is ended shall be deemed to be October 7, 2028).

The plaintiff claimed KRW 49,133,730 as the expenses for the treatment of the king and the aids and aids, while the sum of KRW 11-6 through 10, 26 through 34, and KRW 12,934,010 as the sum of KRW 12,934,010 as the expenses for the treatment of the king and the aids and aids of the case does not fall under the expenses for the physical examination of the case. Thus, the remaining 36,199,720 as the sum of KRW 36,19,720 as the expenses for the treatment of the king and aids and aids of the case is recognized as the expenses for the physical examination of the case.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion to the effect that expenses are unrelated to the accident of this case and not recognized by the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, or that the amount received from the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation overlaps is unfair.

However, the amount received by the Plaintiff from the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service is below

F.2) As seen in paragraph (2), the amount of damages shall be deducted from the amount of damages.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2016.10.07 2015나105313

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.13 2015나679

-서울서부지방법원 2018.06.21 2016가단250666

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.09 2015가단5213165

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.18 2016나60241