The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower court in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable to have determined that the lower court convicted all of the charges of quasi-rape among the facts charged in the instant case, of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively weapons, etc.) and rape committed on December 2013, 2013. In so doing, the lower court did not err by violating the logical and empirical rules and by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.