1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network E, to the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A shall be an agricultural company F.

On March 27, 2013, the Plaintiff provided credit guarantee within the limit of 85,00,000 won out of the guaranteed amount which the F Incorporated Corporation (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) borrowed from Daegu Bank. According to the above credit guarantee agreement between the Plaintiff and the Nonparty Company, the Plaintiff agreed to pay the Plaintiff the amount of the reimbursement by subrogation, delayed damages, substitute payments, guarantee fees, and fees set forth in the Credit Guarantee Fund Act, E had a joint and several liability for reimbursement against the Plaintiff under the above credit guarantee agreement with the Plaintiff; the Plaintiff did not pay the amount of the reimbursement by subrogation to the Plaintiff; the Plaintiff did not pay the amount of the reimbursement by subrogation to the Plaintiff; the Plaintiff did not pay the amount of the reimbursement by subrogation to the Plaintiff; the Plaintiff did not pay the above amount of reimbursement by the heir to the Daegu Bank; the Plaintiff did not pay the amount of reimbursement by subrogation to the Plaintiff; the Plaintiff did not pay the amount of reimbursement by the 203rd Family Court on September 28, 2016; and the Plaintiff paid the amount of reimbursement by subrogation between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff 23616.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants are obligated to pay the money in accordance with Paragraph (1) of the Disposition No. 1 equivalent to their inherited portion within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased to the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.