Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a holder of a low-priced car.

No person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, around January 4, 2016, operated the said car without mandatory insurance when driving the front road of the Incheon Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Seoul Metropolitan City, along the two-lanes between the two-lanes from the breadth of the breadth of the west-gu to the breadth of the west-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Damages Caused by Motor Vehicles Act and selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged (violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Violation of Road Traffic Act) is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle with B low-speed car.

On January 4, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 12:33, and proceeds along the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-way width. In such a case, if the preceding vehicle stops suddenly, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to ensure a distance from the vehicle ahead to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to secure the distance of the vehicle, and was driven by the victim D(26C) of the E-topcar car in the atmosphere of the mast signal without securing the distance of the vehicle, and received the rear part of the E-topcar car driving by the Defendant.

Ultimately, Defendant 1 suffered from the victim F (57) of the victim D and her passenger by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, the injury of fluoral salt, tensions, etc. requiring treatment for about three weeks, respectively. The repair cost, such as exchange of back fluor of the damaged vehicle, is 1.